Clutch Score vs. Consensus: Week 3's Boldest Calls
Where our Clutch Score ranks players most differently than the experts do for Week 3: who we are starting above consensus, and who we are sitting.
This week is in the books: see how these calls did →
The Clutch Score is our own projection of how a player scores this week, built from matchup, Vegas odds, usage and season projections rather than a poll of analysts. Most weeks it lands near expert consensus. Where it doesn't is the interesting part: a gap between our ranking and the field's is where a start/sit edge hides. These are our boldest calls for Week 3.
We line up each player's positional rank in our model against the experts' positional rank for the same week. A back we slot at RB12 whom the consensus has at RB20 is a +8 gap; the wider it is, the bolder the call. Both sides are weekly, so this is a disagreement about Sunday rather than about the season. Our biggest value is DJ Moore (WR28 to us, WR89 by consensus, +61), and our widest fade is Stefon Diggs (WR50 vs WR27, -23).
These calls were locked in on Sep 23, 2026, 10:29 AM ET and do not change afterwards, so they can be checked against what actually happened. Anyone who did not end up playing that week is left out of the lists above; the week's scorecard still carries him.
Starts: where we’re higher than consensus
Players our model ranks meaningfully above the experts this week. If we’re right, these are the lineup calls the field is slower to make.
| Player | Our rank | Consensus | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| WR28 | WR89 | +61 | |
| WR27 | WR51 | +24 | |
| WR7 | WR25 | +18 | |
| WR29 | WR47 | +18 | |
| RB42 | RB58 | +16 | |
| WR43 | WR59 | +16 | |
| WR37 | WR52 | +15 | |
| TE6 | TE19 | +13 | |
| WR16 | WR26 | +10 | |
| WR35 | WR44 | +9 | |
| TE13 | TE22 | +9 | |
| RB36 | RB45 | +9 | |
| WR13 | WR21 | +8 |
Sits: where we’re lower than consensus
Players our model ranks below the experts this week. Not bad players, just ones whose matchup this week reads worse to us than to the field.
| Player | Our rank | Consensus | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| WR50 | WR27 | -23 | |
| WR31 | WR11 | -20 | |
| WR70 | WR50 | -20 | |
| WR58 | WR40 | -18 | |
| WR39 | WR23 | -16 | |
| WR25 | WR10 | -15 | |
| WR46 | WR32 | -14 | |
| RB45 | RB31 | -14 | |
| RB17 | RB5 | -12 | |
| WR18 | WR7 | -11 | |
| TE16 | TE5 | -11 | |
| WR41 | WR31 | -10 | |
| RB51 | RB41 | -10 | |
| RB48 | RB38 | -10 | |
| WR42 | WR33 | -9 |
Put this to work on your Yahoo team
Connect your Yahoo Fantasy league and we’ll score your real roster with the Clutch Score, set this week’s optimal lineup and show the start/sit moves to get there. Read-only access, and you can disconnect at any time.
Rankings reflect FantasyPros expert consensus (PPR); projections via Sleeper. Generated live, so the names update as consensus moves.