← All comparisons

Nate Boerkircher vs Will Kacmarek

Two tight ends fantasy managers weigh against each other for 2026. Here is the head-to-head on projections, expert consensus, ADP and usage, with our Clutch Score verdict on who to draft.

Who to draft

Slight lean · 52% confident
Nate Boerkircher
  • Experts agree: consensus rank 465 vs 468
  • Healthier: no injury designation vs Questionable

Will Kacmarek carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).

Nate Boerkircher and Will Kacmarek are a common 2026 draft-day decision at tight end. Nate Boerkircher holds the edge in expert consensus (TE67 to TE69). The 2026 projections clearly separate them: Will Kacmarek at 62 PPR points (3.6 per game) versus Nate Boerkircher at 27.

For a 2026 redraft, Nate Boerkircher is the narrow pick on stronger expert consensus. Will Kacmarek carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).

Head-to-head

StatBoerkircherKacmarek
Projected points2762
Expert rank (ECR)#465#468
Age2523
Bye week76

Highlighted value wins each row. Season stats are 2025 (PPR); projections, ADP and consensus are for 2026.

Setting a lineup this week? Start/sit: Nate Boerkircher or Will Kacmarek.

Frequently asked

Should I draft Nate Boerkircher or Will Kacmarek in 2026?

Nate Boerkircher is a slight lean over Will Kacmarek for 2026, on stronger expert consensus. Will Kacmarek carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).

Who is projected to score more, Nate Boerkircher or Will Kacmarek?

Will Kacmarek carries the higher 2026 projection at 62 PPR points (3.6 per game), compared with 27 for Nate Boerkircher.

Who is ranked higher, Nate Boerkircher or Will Kacmarek?

Expert consensus ranks Nate Boerkircher (TE67) ahead of Will Kacmarek (TE69) for 2026.

More comparisons

Verdict blends projections, usage, positional rank, consensus and health. Data via the Sleeper API and FantasyPros consensus, refreshed daily.