Jackson Hawes vs Nate Boerkircher
Two tight ends fantasy managers weigh against each other for 2026. Here is the head-to-head on projections, expert consensus, ADP and usage, with our Clutch Score verdict on who to draft.
Who to draft
Clear edge · 80% confident
Jackson Hawes- Higher projection: 32 vs 27 pts
Jackson Hawes and Nate Boerkircher are a common 2026 draft-day decision at tight end. Nate Boerkircher holds the edge in expert consensus (TE67 to TE70). The 2026 projections are nearly even: Jackson Hawes at 32 PPR points (1.9 per game) versus Nate Boerkircher at 27.
For a 2026 redraft, Jackson Hawes is the solid pick on the higher projection.
Head-to-head
| Stat | Hawes | Boerkircher |
|---|---|---|
| Projected points | 32 | 27 |
| Points / game | 3.1 | - |
| Games played | 17 | - |
| Expert rank (ECR) | #475 | #465 |
| ADP | 614 | - |
| Positional rank | TE50 | - |
| Snap share | 44% | - |
| Red-zone touches | 3 | - |
| Age | 25 | 25 |
| Bye week | 7 | 7 |
Highlighted value wins each row. Season stats are 2025 (PPR); projections, ADP and consensus are for 2026.
Setting a lineup this week? Start/sit: Jackson Hawes or Nate Boerkircher.
Frequently asked
Should I draft Jackson Hawes or Nate Boerkircher in 2026?
Jackson Hawes is a solid pick over Nate Boerkircher for 2026, on the higher projection.
Who is projected to score more, Jackson Hawes or Nate Boerkircher?
Jackson Hawes carries the higher 2026 projection at 32 PPR points (1.9 per game), compared with 27 for Nate Boerkircher.
Who is ranked higher, Jackson Hawes or Nate Boerkircher?
Expert consensus ranks Nate Boerkircher (TE67) ahead of Jackson Hawes (TE70) for 2026.
More comparisons
Verdict blends projections, usage, positional rank, consensus and health. Data via the Sleeper API and FantasyPros consensus, refreshed daily.