Hunter Long vs Mo Alie-Cox
Two tight ends fantasy managers weigh against each other for 2026. Here is the head-to-head on projections, expert consensus, ADP and usage, with our Clutch Score verdict on who to draft.
Who to draft
Clear edge · 62% confident
Hunter Long- More points per game: 3.6 vs 1.8
- Better positional rank: TE61 vs TE64
Hunter Long and Mo Alie-Cox are a common 2026 draft-day decision at tight end. Mo Alie-Cox typically comes off the board first, around pick 528 (round 44) to Hunter Long's pick 673.
Last season Mo Alie-Cox carried the heavier workload (39% snap share, 20 touches to Hunter Long's 17), and opportunity is the most stable predictor of fantasy value. Hunter Long is the younger option (age 28), which tilts the long-term and dynasty edge. For a 2026 redraft, Hunter Long is the solid pick on more room to grow.
Head-to-head
| Stat | Long | Alie-Cox |
|---|---|---|
| Projected points | - | 15 |
| Points / game | 3.6 | 1.8 |
| Games played | 9 | 17 |
| ADP | 673 | 528 |
| Positional rank | TE61 | TE64 |
| Snap share | 41% | 39% |
| Red-zone touches | 4 | 5 |
| Age | 28 | 32 |
Highlighted value wins each row. Season stats are 2025 (PPR); projections, ADP and consensus are for 2026.
Setting a lineup this week? Start/sit: Hunter Long or Mo Alie-Cox.
Frequently asked
Should I draft Hunter Long or Mo Alie-Cox in 2026?
Hunter Long is a solid pick over Mo Alie-Cox for 2026, on more room to grow.
Where are Hunter Long and Mo Alie-Cox being drafted?
Mo Alie-Cox has an ADP around pick 528 (round 44), while Hunter Long goes closer to pick 673 (round 57).
More comparisons
Verdict blends projections, usage, positional rank, consensus and health. Data via the Sleeper API and FantasyPros consensus, refreshed daily.