Hunter Long vs Luke Farrell
Two tight ends fantasy managers weigh against each other for 2026. Here is the head-to-head on projections, expert consensus, ADP and usage, with our Clutch Score verdict on who to draft.
Who to draft
Strong edge · 95% confident
Hunter Long- More points per game: 3.6 vs 1.7
- More opportunity: 41% snap share, 4 red-zone touches
- Better positional rank: TE61 vs TE65
Hunter Long and Luke Farrell are a common 2026 draft-day decision at tight end. Luke Farrell typically comes off the board first, around pick 491 (round 41) to Hunter Long's pick 673.
Last season Hunter Long carried the heavier workload (41% snap share, 17 touches to Luke Farrell's 14), and opportunity is the most stable predictor of fantasy value. For a 2026 redraft, Hunter Long is the clear pick on the bigger workload.
Head-to-head
| Stat | Long | Farrell |
|---|---|---|
| Projected points | - | 10 |
| Points / game | 3.6 | 1.7 |
| Games played | 9 | 17 |
| ADP | 673 | 491 |
| Positional rank | TE61 | TE65 |
| Snap share | 41% | 36% |
| Red-zone touches | 4 | 4 |
| Age | 28 | 28 |
Highlighted value wins each row. Season stats are 2025 (PPR); projections, ADP and consensus are for 2026.
Setting a lineup this week? Start/sit: Hunter Long or Luke Farrell.
Frequently asked
Should I draft Hunter Long or Luke Farrell in 2026?
Hunter Long is a clear call over Luke Farrell for 2026, on the bigger workload.
Where are Hunter Long and Luke Farrell being drafted?
Luke Farrell has an ADP around pick 491 (round 41), while Hunter Long goes closer to pick 673 (round 57).
More comparisons
Verdict blends projections, usage, positional rank, consensus and health. Data via the Sleeper API and FantasyPros consensus, refreshed daily.