← All posts
Week 5 · 2026October 6, 20265 min readFinal

Week 5 Buy Low, Sell High: Where Usage and Points Disagree

We priced every target, carry and red-zone look from Weeks 1 to 4 at what it was worth leaguewide, then found the rostered players scoring furthest from their workload, led by Michael Wilson. Who is owed points, and who is living on borrowed ones.

Week 5 and the trade offers keep coming. Somebody in your league is looking at Michael Wilson's 56.8 points and wondering whether to cut bait. Somebody else is sure Chuba Hubbard's 5 touchdowns are who he is now. Both of them are reading the least reliable number a week produces.

Here's a better one. We took every target, carry and red-zone opportunity from Weeks 1 to 4, priced each at what that kind of touch was actually worth across the league at that position, and added it up. That's what an average player would have scored with the same workload. Then we lined it up against what each player really scored. Where the two disagree by a lot, bet on the workload. Offenses keep feeding the players they're feeding. They don't keep throwing 60-yard touchdowns to the same guy.

What one opportunity was worth, Weeks 1 to 4 (PPR points)

1.5WR target
0.4RB carry
4.0WR red-zone look
1.6RB red-zone carry

The red-zone numbers are why touchdowns fool people. A receiver's look inside the 20 turned into a score 42% of the time; a back's carry there, 20%. A few of those bouncing one way or the other swings a four-week total by 10 points or more.

Buy low: the workload is there, the points aren't yet

Michael Wilson leads the list. 44 of 148 targets (30%), 9 red-zone looks, and on the field for 91% of snaps. An average wide receiver turns that into 87.0 points. He has 56.8. Most of the gap is touchdowns, and touchdowns are the part that evens out.

11 rostered players are at least 3 points a game behind their workload over Weeks 1 to 4. 4 of the top 8 haven't scored a touchdown yet. That's the buying window: a manager looking at the box score sees a bust, and you're looking at a role.

Michael WilsonWRARITouchdowns owed

56.8 PPR points on 87.0 expected · 1 TD on 3.8 expected

44 of 148 targets (30%) · 9 red-zone looks · 91% of snaps · drafted Rd 8

30.2pts owed

Courtland SuttonWRDENYards owed

17.6 PPR points on 42.2 expected · 0 TD on 1.7 expected

22 of 125 targets (18%) · 4 red-zone looks · 78% of snaps · drafted Rd 7

24.6pts owed

Trey McBrideTEARITouchdowns owed

69.2 PPR points on 90.2 expected · 2 TD on 4.1 expected

46 of 148 targets (31%) · 9 red-zone looks · 89% of snaps · drafted Rd 3

21.0pts owed

Colston LovelandTECHITouchdowns owed

20.1 PPR points on 39.3 expected · 0 TD on 2.3 expected

18 of 121 targets (15%) · 5 red-zone looks · 87% of snaps · drafted Rd 4

19.2pts owed

KC ConcepcionWRCLEYards owed

30.3 PPR points on 48.1 expected · 0 TD on 0.8 expected

28 of 115 targets (24%) · 4 of 102 carries (4%) · 2 red-zone looks · 79% of snaps · drafted Rd 11

17.8pts owed

Tony PollardRBTENTouchdowns owed

38.5 PPR points on 55.7 expected · 1 TD on 3.1 expected

11 of 108 targets (10%) · 54 of 90 carries (60%) · 16 red-zone looks · 53% of snaps · drafted Rd 8

17.2pts owed

Ashton JeantyRBLVQTouchdowns owed

73.9 PPR points on 88.8 expected · 2 TD on 4.1 expected

24 of 136 targets (18%) · 78 of 119 carries (66%) · 21 red-zone looks · 76% of snaps · drafted Rd 2

14.9pts owed

Josh DownsWRINDTouchdowns owed

37.2 PPR points on 51.0 expected · 0 TD on 1.7 expected

28 of 123 targets (23%) · 4 red-zone looks · 79% of snaps · drafted Rd 10

13.8pts owed

Sell high: the points are ahead of the role

Chuba Hubbard is the clearest sell. 79.0 points on a workload worth 50.4: 61 of 95 carries (64%), 11 of 147 targets (7%) and 5 touchdowns where the red-zone work says 1.8. None of that means he's bad. It means his next few weeks probably look a lot less like his last four, and right now someone in your league is pricing him off the last four.

4 of the 8 below are here mostly because of touchdowns. Those are the easiest sells, because the manager across from you counts the touchdowns and not the looks. The rest have been more efficient per touch than the position usually allows, which can be real, but rarely holds at this pace.

Chuba HubbardRBCARTouchdown-fueled

79.0 PPR points on 50.4 expected · 5 TD on 1.8 expected

11 of 147 targets (7%) · 61 of 95 carries (64%) · 9 red-zone looks · 77% of snaps · drafted Rd 7

28.6pts borrowed

George KittleTESFTouchdown-fueled

64.4 PPR points on 42.3 expected · 4 TD on 1.8 expected

22 of 110 targets (20%) · 4 red-zone looks · 68% of snaps · drafted Rd 7

22.1pts borrowed

Deebo SamuelWRSFHot per touch

57.9 PPR points on 41.0 expected · 3 TD on 2.1 expected

17 of 110 targets (15%) · 7 of 115 carries (6%) · 5 red-zone looks · 60% of snaps · drafted Rd 11

16.9pts borrowed

Dalton KincaidTEBUFHot per touch

46.0 PPR points on 29.9 expected · 1 TD on 0.5 expected

19 of 112 targets (17%) · 1 red-zone look · 66% of snaps · drafted Rd 8

16.1pts borrowed

Travis KelceTEKCHot per touch

52.6 PPR points on 36.9 expected · 2 TD on 0.9 expected

22 of 118 targets (19%) · 2 red-zone looks · 80% of snaps · drafted Rd 8

15.7pts borrowed

Denzel BostonWRCLEHot per touch

55.4 PPR points on 39.7 expected · 2 TD on 1.3 expected

22 of 115 targets (19%) · 3 red-zone looks · 92% of snaps · drafted Rd 15

15.7pts borrowed

Garrett WilsonWRNYJTouchdown-fueled

63.0 PPR points on 47.9 expected · 2 TD on 0.4 expected

31 of 110 targets (28%) · 1 red-zone look · 87% of snaps · drafted Rd 4

15.1pts borrowed

Christian WatsonWRGBTouchdown-fueled

77.1 PPR points on 64.4 expected · 4 TD on 2.9 expected

32 of 150 targets (21%) · 7 red-zone looks · 79% of snaps · drafted Rd 6

12.7pts borrowed

Also running ahead of their workload, and not on the list on purpose: CeeDee Lamb, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Bijan Robinson, Kenneth Walker, Derrick Henry, Drake London, Kyren Williams, Jahmyr Gibbs, Jonathan Taylor. All 9 went in the first three rounds. You drafted them to be the reason you win, the price already assumes big weeks, and four games of good luck doesn't give you anything extra to sell.

Before you hit send

Four games is a small sample, and this is a nudge, not a verdict. The model knows how often a player was targeted and handed the ball. It doesn't know who's healthy, who's covering him, or whether a new coordinator is still figuring out his offense. And no free feed publishes routes run, so snap share is standing in for route participation.

The way to use this: buy the names at the top of the first list from managers who are frustrated with them, and shop the names on the second to managers who think the hot start is who they are. Don't do either for a discount. If the other side won't pay, holding is fine. The whole point is that the role is the part you can count on.

Run an offer through the trade analyzer · Week 4 usage risers · The live waiver board

Yahoo integration

Put this to work on your Yahoo team

Connect your Yahoo Fantasy league and we’ll score your real roster with the Clutch Score, set this week’s optimal lineup and show the start/sit moves to get there. Read-only access, and you can disconnect at any time.

Try the Yahoo optimizer →

Targets, carries, red-zone opportunities and snaps from Sleeper's Weeks 1 to 4 stat lines, captured once each week was final, with shares measured against each player's own team totals. Expected points price each opportunity at the league-wide rate for that position over the same weeks, so across every player at a position the gaps sum to zero. A player who missed a game his team played is left out, so every row covers the full window; a bye does not count against him. Roster share is frozen with the latest capture. ADP and injury designations are live. Fantasy points are full PPR on Sleeper's scoring.