← All comparisons

Justin Fields vs Mac Jones

Two quarterbacks fantasy managers weigh against each other for 2026. Here is the head-to-head on projections, expert consensus, ADP and usage, with our Clutch Score verdict on who to draft.

Who to draft

Strong edge · 95% confident
Justin Fields
  • Higher projection: 35 vs 27 pts
  • More points per game: 16.0 vs 12.4
  • More opportunity: 74% snap share, 12 red-zone touches

Head-to-head

StatFieldsJones
Projected points3527
Points / game16.012.4
Games played911
Expert rank (ECR)#353#344
Positional rankQB28QB31
Snap share74%49%
Red-zone touches123
Age2727
Bye week58

Highlighted value wins each row. Season stats are 2025 (PPR); projections, ADP and consensus are for 2026.

More comparisons

Verdict blends projections, usage, positional rank, consensus and health. Data via the Sleeper API and FantasyPros consensus, refreshed daily.