Jackson Hawes vs Tanner Hudson
Two tight ends fantasy managers weigh against each other for 2026. Here is the head-to-head on projections, expert consensus, ADP and usage, with our Clutch Score verdict on who to draft.
Who to draft
Strong edge · 95% confident
Jackson Hawes- Higher projection: 32 vs 6 pts
- More opportunity: 44% snap share, 3 red-zone touches
- Better positional rank: TE48 vs TE52
Jackson Hawes and Tanner Hudson are a common 2026 draft-day decision at tight end. The 2026 projections clearly separate them: Jackson Hawes at 32 PPR points (1.9 per game) versus Tanner Hudson at 6.
Last season Tanner Hudson carried the heavier workload (16% snap share, 24 touches to Jackson Hawes's 19), and opportunity is the most stable predictor of fantasy value. Jackson Hawes is the younger option (age 25), which tilts the long-term and dynasty edge. For a 2026 redraft, Jackson Hawes is the clear pick on the higher projection and more room to grow.
Head-to-head
| Stat | Hawes | Hudson |
|---|---|---|
| Projected points | 32 | 6 |
| Points / game | 3.1 | 3.2 |
| Games played | 17 | 15 |
| Expert rank (ECR) | - | #492 |
| Positional rank | TE48 | TE52 |
| Snap share | 44% | 16% |
| Red-zone touches | 3 | 6 |
| Age | 25 | 31 |
| Bye week | - | 6 |
Highlighted value wins each row. Season stats are 2025 (PPR); projections, ADP and consensus are for 2026.
Setting a lineup this week? Start/sit: Jackson Hawes or Tanner Hudson.
Frequently asked
Should I draft Jackson Hawes or Tanner Hudson in 2026?
Jackson Hawes is a clear call over Tanner Hudson for 2026, on the higher projection and more room to grow.
Who is projected to score more, Jackson Hawes or Tanner Hudson?
Jackson Hawes carries the higher 2026 projection at 32 PPR points (1.9 per game), compared with 6 for Tanner Hudson.
More comparisons
Verdict blends projections, usage, positional rank, consensus and health. Data via the Sleeper API and FantasyPros consensus, refreshed daily.