← All comparisons

Grant Calcaterra vs Tanner Hudson

Two tight ends fantasy managers weigh against each other for 2026. Here is the head-to-head on projections, expert consensus, ADP and usage, with our Clutch Score verdict on who to draft.

Who to draft

Slight lean · 62% confident
Grant Calcaterra
  • Higher projection: 26 vs 6 pts
  • More opportunity: 40% snap share, 3 red-zone touches

Grant Calcaterra and Tanner Hudson are a common 2026 draft-day decision at tight end. The 2026 projections give a modest edge: Grant Calcaterra at 26 PPR points (1.5 per game) versus Tanner Hudson at 6.

Last season Tanner Hudson carried the heavier workload (16% snap share, 24 touches to Grant Calcaterra's 13), and opportunity is the most stable predictor of fantasy value. Grant Calcaterra is the younger option (age 27), which tilts the long-term and dynasty edge. For a 2026 redraft, Grant Calcaterra is the narrow pick on the higher projection and more room to grow.

Head-to-head

StatCalcaterraHudson
Projected points266
Points / game1.53.2
Games played1515
Expert rank (ECR)-#527
ADP686-
Positional rankTE71TE54
Snap share40%16%
Red-zone touches36
Age2731
Bye week-6

Highlighted value wins each row. Season stats are 2025 (PPR); projections, ADP and consensus are for 2026.

Setting a lineup this week? Start/sit: Grant Calcaterra or Tanner Hudson.

Frequently asked

Should I draft Grant Calcaterra or Tanner Hudson in 2026?

Grant Calcaterra is a slight lean over Tanner Hudson for 2026, on the higher projection and more room to grow.

Who is projected to score more, Grant Calcaterra or Tanner Hudson?

Grant Calcaterra carries the higher 2026 projection at 26 PPR points (1.5 per game), compared with 6 for Tanner Hudson.

More comparisons

Verdict blends projections, usage, positional rank, consensus and health. Data via the Sleeper API and FantasyPros consensus, refreshed daily.