David Sills vs Mitchell Tinsley
Two wide receivers fantasy managers weigh against each other for 2026. Here is the head-to-head on projections, expert consensus, ADP and usage, with our Clutch Score verdict on who to draft.
Who to draft
Strong edge · 95% confident
David Sills- More points per game: 2.9 vs 1.9
- More opportunity: 50% snap share, 6 red-zone touches
- Better positional rank: WR106 vs WR120
Mitchell Tinsley carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).
David Sills and Mitchell Tinsley are a common 2026 draft-day decision at wide receiver.
Last season David Sills carried the heavier workload (50% snap share, 36 touches to Mitchell Tinsley's 24), and opportunity is the most stable predictor of fantasy value. Mitchell Tinsley is the younger option (age 26), which tilts the long-term and dynasty edge. For a 2026 redraft, David Sills is the clear pick on the bigger workload. Mitchell Tinsley carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).
Head-to-head
| Stat | Sills | Tinsley |
|---|---|---|
| Projected points | 27 | - |
| Points / game | 2.9 | 1.9 |
| Games played | 17 | 17 |
| Expert rank (ECR) | - | #532 |
| ADP | 405 | - |
| Positional rank | WR106 | WR120 |
| Snap share | 50% | 27% |
| Red-zone touches | 6 | 5 |
| Age | 30 | 26 |
| Bye week | - | 8 |
Highlighted value wins each row. Season stats are 2025 (PPR); projections, ADP and consensus are for 2026.
Setting a lineup this week? Start/sit: David Sills or Mitchell Tinsley.
Frequently asked
Should I draft David Sills or Mitchell Tinsley in 2026?
David Sills is a clear call over Mitchell Tinsley for 2026, on the bigger workload. Mitchell Tinsley carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).
More comparisons
Verdict blends projections, usage, positional rank, consensus and health. Data via the Sleeper API and FantasyPros consensus, refreshed daily.