← All comparisons

Blake Whiteheart vs Tanner Hudson

Two tight ends fantasy managers weigh against each other for 2026. Here is the head-to-head on projections, expert consensus, ADP and usage, with our Clutch Score verdict on who to draft.

Who to draft

Slight lean · 52% confident
Blake Whiteheart
  • More points per game: 2.4 vs 1.4
  • Better scoring rank so far: TE42 vs TE55

Blake Whiteheart and Tanner Hudson are a common 2026 draft-day decision at tight end. The 2026 projections are nearly even: Tanner Hudson at 6 PPR points (0.3 per game) versus Blake Whiteheart at 4.

Last season Blake Whiteheart carried the heavier workload (0% snap share, 1 touches to Tanner Hudson's 1), and opportunity is the most stable predictor of fantasy value. Blake Whiteheart is the younger option (age 26), which tilts the long-term and dynasty edge. For a 2026 redraft, Blake Whiteheart is the narrow pick on more room to grow. Tanner Hudson carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).

Head-to-head

StatWhiteheartHudson
Projected points46
Points / game2.41.4
Games played11
Expert rank (ECR)-#527
Scoring rank (season)TE42TE55
Snap share0%0%
Red-zone touches00
Age2631
Bye week-6

Highlighted value wins each row. Season stats are 2026 (PPR); projections, ADP and consensus are for 2026.

Setting a lineup this week? Start/sit: Blake Whiteheart or Tanner Hudson.

Frequently asked

Should I draft Blake Whiteheart or Tanner Hudson in 2026?

Blake Whiteheart is a slight lean over Tanner Hudson for 2026, on more room to grow. Tanner Hudson carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).

Who is projected to score more, Blake Whiteheart or Tanner Hudson?

Tanner Hudson carries the higher 2026 projection at 6 PPR points (0.3 per game), compared with 4 for Blake Whiteheart.

More comparisons

Verdict blends projections, usage, positional rank, consensus and health. Data via the Sleeper API and FantasyPros consensus, refreshed daily.