Blake Whiteheart vs Tanner Hudson
Two tight ends fantasy managers weigh against each other for 2026. Here is the head-to-head on projections, expert consensus, ADP and usage, with our Clutch Score verdict on who to draft.
Who to draft
Slight lean · 52% confident- More points per game: 2.4 vs 1.4
- Better scoring rank so far: TE42 vs TE55
Blake Whiteheart and Tanner Hudson are a common 2026 draft-day decision at tight end. The 2026 projections are nearly even: Tanner Hudson at 6 PPR points (0.3 per game) versus Blake Whiteheart at 4.
Last season Blake Whiteheart carried the heavier workload (0% snap share, 1 touches to Tanner Hudson's 1), and opportunity is the most stable predictor of fantasy value. Blake Whiteheart is the younger option (age 26), which tilts the long-term and dynasty edge. For a 2026 redraft, Blake Whiteheart is the narrow pick on more room to grow. Tanner Hudson carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).
Head-to-head
| Stat | Whiteheart | Hudson |
|---|---|---|
| Projected points | 4 | 6 |
| Points / game | 2.4 | 1.4 |
| Games played | 1 | 1 |
| Expert rank (ECR) | - | #527 |
| Scoring rank (season) | TE42 | TE55 |
| Snap share | 0% | 0% |
| Red-zone touches | 0 | 0 |
| Age | 26 | 31 |
| Bye week | - | 6 |
Highlighted value wins each row. Season stats are 2026 (PPR); projections, ADP and consensus are for 2026.
Setting a lineup this week? Start/sit: Blake Whiteheart or Tanner Hudson.
Frequently asked
Should I draft Blake Whiteheart or Tanner Hudson in 2026?
Blake Whiteheart is a slight lean over Tanner Hudson for 2026, on more room to grow. Tanner Hudson carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).
Who is projected to score more, Blake Whiteheart or Tanner Hudson?
Tanner Hudson carries the higher 2026 projection at 6 PPR points (0.3 per game), compared with 4 for Blake Whiteheart.
More comparisons
Verdict blends projections, usage, positional rank, consensus and health. Data via the Sleeper API and FantasyPros consensus, refreshed daily.