← All comparisons

Andrew Armstrong vs Tim Patrick

Two wide receivers fantasy managers weigh against each other for 2026. Here is the head-to-head on projections, expert consensus, ADP and usage, with our Clutch Score verdict on who to draft.

Who to draft

Strong edge · 95% confident
Tim Patrick
  • More points per game: 2.4 vs 1.8
  • More opportunity: 82% snap share
  • Better scoring rank so far: WR118 vs WR125

Andrew Armstrong and Tim Patrick are a common 2026 draft-day decision at wide receiver. The 2026 projections give a modest edge: Andrew Armstrong at 34 PPR points (2.0 per game) versus Tim Patrick at 14.

Last season Tim Patrick carried the heavier workload (82% snap share, 6 touches to Andrew Armstrong's 4), and opportunity is the most stable predictor of fantasy value. Andrew Armstrong is the younger option (age 25), which tilts the long-term and dynasty edge. For a 2026 redraft, Tim Patrick is the clear pick on the bigger workload. Andrew Armstrong carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).

Head-to-head

StatArmstrongPatrick
Projected points3414
Points / game1.82.4
Games played23
Expert rank (ECR)-#485
ADP-573
Scoring rank (season)WR125WR118
Snap share69%82%
Red-zone touches10
Age2532
Bye week-13

Highlighted value wins each row. Season stats are 2026 (PPR); projections, ADP and consensus are for 2026.

Setting a lineup this week? Start/sit: Andrew Armstrong or Tim Patrick.

Frequently asked

Should I draft Andrew Armstrong or Tim Patrick in 2026?

Tim Patrick is a clear call over Andrew Armstrong for 2026, on the bigger workload. Andrew Armstrong carries more upside if you need a ceiling (younger / higher projection).

Who is projected to score more, Andrew Armstrong or Tim Patrick?

Andrew Armstrong carries the higher 2026 projection at 34 PPR points (2.0 per game), compared with 14 for Tim Patrick.

More comparisons

Verdict blends projections, usage, positional rank, consensus and health. Data via the Sleeper API and FantasyPros consensus, refreshed daily.