← All posts
Week 8 · 2026October 27, 20265 min readFinal

Week 8 Buy Low, Sell High: Where Usage and Points Disagree

We priced every target, carry and red-zone look from Weeks 4 to 7 at what it was worth leaguewide, then found the rostered players scoring furthest from their workload, led by Michael Wilson. Who is owed points, and who is living on borrowed ones.

Week 8 and the trade offers keep coming. Somebody in your league is looking at Michael Wilson's 41.6 points and wondering whether to cut bait. Somebody else is sure Christian Watson's 2 touchdowns are who he is now. Both of them are reading the least reliable number a week produces.

Here's a better one. We took every target, carry and red-zone opportunity from Weeks 4 to 7, priced each at what that kind of touch was actually worth across the league at that position, and added it up. That's what an average player would have scored with the same workload. Then we lined it up against what each player really scored. Where the two disagree by a lot, bet on the workload. Offenses keep feeding the players they're feeding. They don't keep throwing 60-yard touchdowns to the same guy.

What one opportunity was worth, Weeks 4 to 7 (PPR points)

1.4WR target
0.4RB carry
3.4WR red-zone look
1.8RB red-zone carry

The red-zone numbers are why touchdowns fool people. A receiver's look inside the 20 turned into a score 33% of the time; a back's carry there, 22%. A few of those bouncing one way or the other swings a four-week total by 10 points or more.

Buy low: the workload is there, the points aren't yet

Michael Wilson leads the list. 35 of 159 targets (22%) and 2 of 103 carries (2%), 8 red-zone looks, and on the field for 90% of snaps. An average wide receiver turns that into 66.2 points. He has 41.6. Most of the gap is touchdowns, and touchdowns are the part that evens out.

6 rostered players are at least 3 points a game behind their workload over Weeks 4 to 7. 2 of the top 6 haven't scored a touchdown yet. That's the buying window: a manager looking at the box score sees a bust, and you're looking at a role.

Michael WilsonWRARITouchdowns owed

41.6 PPR points on 66.2 expected · 0 TD on 2.6 expected

35 of 159 targets (22%) · 2 of 103 carries (2%) · 8 red-zone looks · 90% of snaps · drafted Rd 8

24.6pts owed

Derrick HenryRBBALTouchdowns owed

47.8 PPR points on 65.9 expected · 2 TD on 3.8 expected

7 of 125 targets (6%) · 81 of 115 carries (70%) · 17 red-zone looks · 56% of snaps · drafted Rd 2

QB Lamar Jackson is listed Out

18.1pts owed

Chase BrownRBCINTouchdowns owed

35.9 PPR points on 51.4 expected · 0 TD on 1.8 expected

20 of 112 targets (18%) · 33 of 66 carries (50%) · 8 red-zone looks · 72% of snaps · drafted Rd 2

15.5pts owed

CeeDee LambWRDALYards owed

84.6 PPR points on 99.3 expected · 3 TD on 3.3 expected

56 of 165 targets (34%) · 1 of 91 carries (1%) · 10 red-zone looks · 79% of snaps · drafted Rd 1

14.7pts owed

Wan'Dale RobinsonWRTENYards owed

32.2 PPR points on 45.7 expected · 1 TD on 1.6 expected

25 of 115 targets (22%) · 1 of 97 carries (1%) · 5 red-zone looks · 66% of snaps · drafted Rd 11

13.5pts owed

Aaron Jones Sr.RBMINQTouchdowns owed

39.1 PPR points on 51.6 expected · 1 TD on 2.2 expected

12 of 86 targets (14%) · 53 of 96 carries (55%) · 10 red-zone looks · 64% of snaps · drafted Rd 11

12.5pts owed

One thing the math can't see: one of these players may be catching passes from a backup soon. Derrick Henry's quarterback, Lamar Jackson, is listed Out. The targets were earned with the starter under center. Some of that share usually survives a backup, but the value of each target won't, so knock these down a tier until the quarterback picture clears up.

Sell high: the points are ahead of the role

Christian Watson is the clearest sell. 60.1 points on a workload worth 40.1: 27 of 143 targets (19%) and 2 touchdowns where the red-zone work says 0.3. None of that means he's bad. It means his next few weeks probably look a lot less like his last four, and right now someone in your league is pricing him off the last four.

3 of the 8 below are here mostly because of touchdowns. Those are the easiest sells, because the manager across from you counts the touchdowns and not the looks. The rest have been more efficient per touch than the position usually allows, which can be real, but rarely holds at this pace.

Christian WatsonWRGBTouchdown-fueled

60.1 PPR points on 40.1 expected · 2 TD on 0.3 expected

27 of 143 targets (19%) · 1 red-zone look · 80% of snaps · drafted Rd 6

20.0pts borrowed

Tetairoa McMillanWRCARHot per touch

67.8 PPR points on 47.8 expected · 2 TD on 0.7 expected

31 of 103 targets (30%) · 2 red-zone looks · 79% of snaps · drafted Rd 4

20.0pts borrowed

Jaylen WarrenRBPITHot per touch

78.9 PPR points on 59.0 expected · 2 TD on 0.9 expected

20 of 141 targets (14%) · 64 of 93 carries (69%) · 4 red-zone looks · 80% of snaps · drafted Rd 6

19.9pts borrowed

Jameson WilliamsWRDETTouchdown-fueled

61.0 PPR points on 41.5 expected · 4 TD on 2.0 expected

21 of 111 targets (19%) · 6 red-zone looks · 91% of snaps · drafted Rd 5

19.5pts borrowed

Kyle Pitts Sr.TEATLTouchdown-fueled

59.1 PPR points on 43.4 expected · 4 TD on 2.3 expected

21 of 119 targets (18%) · 6 red-zone looks · 62% of snaps · drafted Rd 6

15.7pts borrowed

Tee HigginsWRCINHot per touch

57.7 PPR points on 42.1 expected · 1 TD on 0.7 expected

27 of 112 targets (24%) · 2 red-zone looks · 78% of snaps · drafted Rd 4

15.6pts borrowed

Luther Burden IIIWRCHIHot per touch

61.5 PPR points on 46.8 expected · 1 TD on 1.6 expected

24 of 134 targets (18%) · 6 of 141 carries (4%) · 5 red-zone looks · 57% of snaps · drafted Rd 5

14.7pts borrowed

Rhamondre StevensonRBNEHot per touch

62.0 PPR points on 47.4 expected · 3 TD on 1.8 expected

13 of 127 targets (10%) · 46 of 119 carries (39%) · 8 red-zone looks · 66% of snaps · drafted Rd 7

14.6pts borrowed

Also running ahead of their workload, and not on the list on purpose: Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Malik Nabers, Kenneth Walker III, George Pickens, Javonte Williams, Nico Collins. All 6 went in the first three rounds. You drafted them to be the reason you win, the price already assumes big weeks, and four games of good luck doesn't give you anything extra to sell.

Before you hit send

Four games is a small sample, and this is a nudge, not a verdict. The model knows how often a player was targeted and handed the ball. It doesn't know who's healthy, who's covering him, or whether a new coordinator is still figuring out his offense. And no free feed publishes routes run, so snap share is standing in for route participation.

The way to use this: buy the names at the top of the first list from managers who are frustrated with them, and shop the names on the second to managers who think the hot start is who they are. Don't do either for a discount. If the other side won't pay, holding is fine. The whole point is that the role is the part you can count on.

Run an offer through the trade analyzer · Week 7 usage risers · The live waiver board

Yahoo integration

Put this to work on your Yahoo team

Connect your Yahoo Fantasy league and we’ll score your real roster with the Clutch Score, set this week’s optimal lineup and show the start/sit moves to get there. Read-only access, and you can disconnect at any time.

Try the Yahoo optimizer →

Targets, carries, red-zone opportunities and snaps from Sleeper's Weeks 4 to 7 stat lines, captured once each week was final, with shares measured against each player's own team totals. Expected points price each opportunity at the league-wide rate for that position over the same weeks, so across every player at a position the gaps sum to zero. A player who missed a game his team played is left out, so every row covers the full window; a bye does not count against him. Roster share is frozen with the latest capture. ADP and injury designations are live. Fantasy points are full PPR on Sleeper's scoring.