← All posts
Week 3 · 2026September 22, 20265 min readFinal

Week 3 Buy Low, Sell High: Where Usage and Points Disagree

We priced every target, carry and red-zone look from Weeks 1 and 2 at what it was worth leaguewide, then found the rostered players scoring furthest from their workload, led by Terry McLaurin. Who is owed points, and who is living on borrowed ones.

Two weeks in is when the trade offers start. Somebody in your league is looking at Terry McLaurin's 10.4 points and wondering whether to cut bait. Somebody else is sure Chuba Hubbard's 3 touchdowns are who he is now. Both of them are reading the least reliable number a week produces.

Here's a better one. We took every target, carry and red-zone opportunity from Weeks 1 and 2, priced each at what that kind of touch was actually worth across the league at that position, and added it up. That's what an average player would have scored with the same workload. Then we lined it up against what each player really scored. Where the two disagree by a lot, bet on the workload. Offenses keep feeding the players they're feeding. They don't keep throwing 60-yard touchdowns to the same guy.

What one opportunity was worth, Weeks 1 and 2 (PPR points)

1.5WR target
0.4RB carry
4.2WR red-zone look
1.6RB red-zone carry

The red-zone numbers are why touchdowns fool people. A receiver's look inside the 20 turned into a score 46% of the time; a back's carry there, 19%. A few of those bouncing one way or the other swings a two-week total by 10 points or more.

Buy low: the workload is there, the points aren't yet

Terry McLaurin leads the list. 13 of 63 targets (21%), 2 red-zone looks, and on the field for 79% of snaps. An average wide receiver turns that into 24.7 points. He has 10.4. Most of the gap is catches and yards that didn't come, which is the part a player controls most, so check the tape before you pay full price.

20 rostered players are at least 3 points a game behind their workload over Weeks 1 and 2. 7 of the top 8 haven't scored a touchdown yet. That's the buying window: a manager looking at the box score sees a bust, and you're looking at a role.

Terry McLaurinWRWASQYards owed

10.4 PPR points on 24.7 expected · 0 TD on 0.9 expected

13 of 63 targets (21%) · 2 red-zone looks · 79% of snaps · drafted Rd 5

14.3pts owed

DK MetcalfWRPITYards owed

14.7 PPR points on 28.1 expected · 0 TD on 0.0 expected

19 of 74 targets (26%) · 0 red-zone looks · 96% of snaps · drafted Rd 7

13.4pts owed

De'Von AchaneRBMIAIRTouchdowns owed

22.9 PPR points on 35.9 expected · 0 TD on 1.3 expected

11 of 50 targets (22%) · 31 of 47 carries (66%) · 7 red-zone looks · 81% of snaps · drafted Rd 2

13.0pts owed

Xavier WorthyWRKCYards owed

18.3 PPR points on 30.3 expected · 1 TD on 1.8 expected

13 of 68 targets (19%) · 4 red-zone looks · 82% of snaps · drafted Rd 12

12.0pts owed

Tetairoa McMillanWRCARTouchdowns owed

25.6 PPR points on 37.6 expected · 0 TD on 1.8 expected

18 of 66 targets (27%) · 4 red-zone looks · 81% of snaps · drafted Rd 4

12.0pts owed

Colston LovelandTECHIYards owed

1.3 PPR points on 13.0 expected · 0 TD on 0.9 expected

5 of 56 targets (9%) · 2 red-zone looks · 87% of snaps · drafted Rd 4

11.7pts owed

Malik NabersWRNYGQTouchdowns owed

14.0 PPR points on 24.7 expected · 0 TD on 0.9 expected

13 of 61 targets (21%) · 2 red-zone looks · 62% of snaps · drafted Rd 3

10.7pts owed

Quentin JohnstonWRLACOYards owed

6.1 PPR points on 16.7 expected · 0 TD on 0.0 expected

11 of 53 targets (21%) · 1 of 53 carries (2%) · 0 red-zone looks · 80% of snaps · drafted Rd 10

10.6pts owed

Sell high: the points are ahead of the role

Davante Adams is the clearest sell. 45.1 points on a workload worth 26.4: 16 of 57 targets (28%) and 2 touchdowns where the red-zone work says 0.5. None of that means he's bad. It means his next few weeks probably look a lot less like his last two, and right now someone in your league is pricing him off the last two.

5 of the 8 below are here mostly because of touchdowns. Those are the easiest sells, because the manager across from you counts the touchdowns and not the looks. The rest have been more efficient per touch than the position usually allows, which can be real, but rarely holds at this pace.

Davante AdamsWRLARHot per touch

45.1 PPR points on 26.4 expected · 2 TD on 0.5 expected

16 of 57 targets (28%) · 1 red-zone look · 59% of snaps · drafted Rd 5

18.7pts borrowed

Dalton KincaidTEBUFHot per touch

40.5 PPR points on 23.4 expected · 1 TD on 0.5 expected

14 of 56 targets (25%) · 1 red-zone look · 69% of snaps · drafted Rd 8

17.1pts borrowed

Chuba HubbardRBCARTouchdown-fueled

38.1 PPR points on 24.0 expected · 3 TD on 1.3 expected

5 of 66 targets (8%) · 22 of 44 carries (50%) · 7 red-zone looks · 68% of snaps · drafted Rd 7

14.1pts borrowed

D'Andre SwiftRBCHITouchdown-fueled

45.3 PPR points on 32.7 expected · 3 TD on 1.7 expected

6 of 56 targets (11%) · 34 of 70 carries (49%) · 9 red-zone looks · 62% of snaps · drafted Rd 5

12.6pts borrowed

Jakobi MeyersWRJAXTouchdown-fueled

16.0 PPR points on 4.8 expected · 1 TD on 0.0 expected

3 of 49 targets (6%) · 1 of 56 carries (2%) · 0 red-zone looks · 78% of snaps · drafted Rd 11

11.2pts borrowed

Christian WatsonWRGBTouchdown-fueled

46.8 PPR points on 36.4 expected · 3 TD on 1.4 expected

19 of 69 targets (28%) · 3 red-zone looks · 83% of snaps · drafted Rd 6

10.4pts borrowed

Kyle MonangaiRBCHIOHot per touch

28.2 PPR points on 18.4 expected · 1 TD on 0.8 expected

4 of 56 targets (7%) · 20 of 70 carries (29%) · 4 red-zone looks · 38% of snaps · drafted Rd 9

9.8pts borrowed

Parker WashingtonWRJAXTouchdown-fueled

36.1 PPR points on 26.6 expected · 1 TD on 0.0 expected

18 of 49 targets (37%) · 0 red-zone looks · 72% of snaps · drafted Rd 7

9.5pts borrowed

Also running ahead of their workload, and not on the list on purpose: Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Derrick Henry, CeeDee Lamb, Chris Olave, Jonathan Taylor, Justin Jefferson, Bijan Robinson, Amon-Ra St. Brown, Kyren Williams, Jahmyr Gibbs. All 10 went in the first three rounds. You drafted them to be the reason you win, the price already assumes big weeks, and two games of good luck doesn't give you anything extra to sell.

Before you hit send

Two games is a small sample, and this is a nudge, not a verdict. The model knows how often a player was targeted and handed the ball. It doesn't know who's healthy, who's covering him, or whether a new coordinator is still figuring out his offense. And no free feed publishes routes run, so snap share is standing in for route participation.

The way to use this: buy the names at the top of the first list from managers who are frustrated with them, and shop the names on the second to managers who think the hot start is who they are. Don't do either for a discount. If the other side won't pay, holding is fine. The whole point is that the role is the part you can count on.

Run an offer through the trade analyzer · Week 2 usage risers · The live waiver board

Yahoo integration

Put this to work on your Yahoo team

Connect your Yahoo Fantasy league and we’ll score your real roster with the Clutch Score, set this week’s optimal lineup and show the start/sit moves to get there. Read-only access, and you can disconnect at any time.

Try the Yahoo optimizer →

Targets, carries, red-zone opportunities and snaps from Sleeper's Weeks 1 and 2 stat lines, captured once each week was final, with shares measured against each player's own team totals. Expected points price each opportunity at the league-wide rate for that position over the same weeks, so across every player at a position the gaps sum to zero. A player who missed a game his team played is left out, so every row covers the full window; a bye does not count against him. Roster share is frozen with the latest capture. ADP and injury designations are live. Fantasy points are full PPR on Sleeper's scoring.